Skip to content

Blog1 min read

On the album as a unit versus the track

The track is the same; the contract isn't. The playlist is a doorway, not a destination.

Most of the music I love was made as an album — a forty-minute object with an order, a shape, and a contract between the listener and the artist about how to listen. Most of the music on the playlists here is taken out of that object and slotted into a different one. The track is the same; the contract isn't.

For some albums, this is fine. The artist released the tracks separately on streaming services from the start, and the album is the secondary object. For other albums — especially older ones, especially ambient ones — the track-shaped listening is a smaller version of what the music was meant to do. The playlists do something useful with the smaller version, but they don't replace the larger one.

When a listener falls for a track on a playlist, the next step ought to be the album. The playlist is a doorway, not a destination. This is part of why each track on these rooms keeps the artist visible and the album visible underneath — the listener who wants to walk through the doorway can.

I think a lot of curation writing pretends this isn't a problem. It is. The track-shaped listening on streaming has made album-shaped listening rarer than it ought to be. The rooms here are a track-shaped product trying to point, gently, at the larger object the tracks came from.

Continue reading